FRIENDSHIP ACROSS FRONTIERS

The Lynching Of Iraq
Home
FAF Chairman Arrested
Stop Handover Of Iraq POWs
The Lynching Of Iraq
Letter To UN Secretary General
News
Contact Us
Letter to the Kuwaiti Ambassador
Letter To Tony Blair

Prior to the invasion both US/UK administration made substantial efforts to present a façade of unified Iraqi opposition in order to justify their illegal invasion and to win the flagging US/UK public support.



On reflection I made a remark in 1993 to the Deputy Prime Minister, Tariq Azziz, that Iraq is very fortunate for having such Diaspra opposition not only lurking outside its borders, but disunited, and lacking credible local support. The current lawless situation is a manifestation of the above and the failure of occupation. The fact remains then and now that these Iraqi Diaspra were only united in their revenge and hatred of Saddam, beyond that national loyalty, or governance were a consideration beyond their capability.



This Diaspra opposition grouping were made up of two factions of opportunists:



A collection of non-Arab origin collaborators/traitors, with terrorist pasts having separatist allegiance to Safavid; Iran (Sciri, Dawa and Al Sader/Mahdi) or Kurdish warlords of the Barazani and Talabani clans with close ties to the Zionist entity.



Dissatisfied ex-Baathists who lost favour with the Iraqi leadership (Ayad Alawi and his small group aligned to US/UK). Few ex-Baathist;athists who maintained their opposition but were opposed to the maintenance of sanctions and invasion (presently are loosely involved with the Green Zone Diaspra).



Indeed in view of the aforesaid it is absurd for some to propagate the Bush/Blair's administration's assertion that the Iraqis are divided on ethic and sectarian divides. Particularly in view of the following:



(1) Divisions gained prominence since the occupation in order to undermine the popularity of the resistance to occupation and to establish an intellectual/professional desert as a prelude to dividing Iraq into three regions and the establishment of permanent US bases.



(2) The population are unable to move freely within their neighbourhood or into other districts because of numerous checkpoints and road blocks. Those who roam freely are Mossad, CIA, the militias and foreign mercenaries where lawlessness and sectarian ethnic fighting served their interest.



The present paralysis by fear is a reflection of the US/UK dependency on Diaspra Iraqis to rule Iraq, particularly as their shortfall of disunity, incompetence and corruption were known to officials of HM Government and the White House. Yet the US/UK further encouraged the new Iraqi police and Army to be solely drawn from the militia of the Badir Brigade, Mahdi army and the warlord’s Beshmurga!!



The rush by Bush/Blair to invade Iraq is widely acceptable to have been based on lies, violation of UN Charter, and an ambiguous end game. Embarking on an election under occupation or the drawing of a new constitution by the CPA has failed to bring about stability, improvement of living standards, or development of fair oil policies. The majority of the Iraqi people (outside the Green Zone) regard the invasion and the presence of the US/UK troops as having contributed to their problems by fueling sectarian/ethnic in-fighting. Also encouraged nepotism, corruption, unemployment, downgrading of education/health care, flight of Christian minorities, professionals/ academics and general lawlessness. While during Saddam's rule, according to the UN Iraq achieved prior to sanctions, the best free health and education in the region, together with a flourishing industrial manufacturing capability, eradication of illiteracy, public ownership of the oil resources, women's equality, secular society where minorities rights are upheld and sincere solidarity with the Palestinian struggle.



His rule was ended by unilateral illegal foreign invasion.



His trial was a sham, illegal, unjust and violated all legal and human rights standards.



His brutal lynching was carried out by SAFAVID Iraqi with total contempt for normal human behaviour. Paradoxically his life was ended similarly to the fate of Imam Hussain and Omar Al Mukhtar by blind revenge. Indeed their despicable misconduct at the lynching has elevated Saddam to be regarded as a martyr by many in the Arab and Islamic world. Victors justice at its worst!







Riad El-Taher

Chair



Prior to the invasion both US/UK administration made substantial efforts to present a façade of unified Iraqi opposition in order to justify their illegal invasion and to win the flagging US/UK public support.

On reflection I made a remark in 1993 to the Deputy Prime Minister, Tariq Azziz, that Iraq is very fortunate for having such Diaspra opposition not only lurking outside its borders, but disunited, and lacking credible local support. The current lawless situation is a manifestation of the above and the failure of occupation. The fact remains then and now that these Iraqi Diaspra were only united in their revenge and hatred of Saddam, beyond that national loyalty, or governance were a consideration beyond their capability.

This Diaspra opposition grouping were made up of two factions of opportunists:

A collection of non-Arab origin collaborators/traitors, with terrorist pasts having separatist allegiance to “Safavid” Iran (Sciri, Dawa and Al Sader/Mahdi) or Kurdish warlords of the Barazani and Talabani clans with close ties to the Zionist entity.

Dissatisfied ex-Ba’athists who lost favour with the Iraqi leadership (Ayad Alawi and his small group aligned to US/UK). Few ex-Ba’athists who maintained their opposition but were opposed to the maintenance of sanctions and invasion (presently are loosely involved with the Green Zone Diaspra).

Indeed in view of the aforesaid it is absurd for some to propagate the Bush/Blair’s administration’s assertion that the Iraqis are divided on ethic and sectarian divides. Particularly in view of the following:

(1) Divisions gained prominence since the occupation in order to undermine the popularity of the resistance to occupation and to establish an intellectual/professional desert as a prelude to dividing Iraq into three regions and the establishment of permanent US bases.

(2) The population are unable to move freely within their neighbourhood or into other districts because of numerous checkpoints and road blocks. Those who roam freely are Mossad, CIA, the militias and foreign mercenaries where lawlessness and sectarian ethnic fighting served their interest.

The present paralysis by fear is a reflection of the US/UK dependency on Diaspra Iraqis to rule Iraq, particularly as their shortfall of disunity, incompetence and corruption were known to officials of HM Government and the White House. Yet the US/UK further encouraged the new Iraqi police and Army to be solely drawn from the militia of the Badir Brigade, Mahdi army and the warlord’s Beshmurga!!

The rush by Bush/Blair to invade Iraq is widely acceptable to have been based on lies, violation of UN Charter, and an ambiguous end game. Embarking on an election under occupation or the drawing of a new constitution by the CPA has failed to bring about stability, improvement of living standards, or development of fair oil policies. The majority of the Iraqi people (outside the Green Zone) regard the invasion and the presence of the US/UK troops as having contributed to their problems by fueling sectarian/ethnic in-fighting. Also encouraged nepotism, corruption, unemployment, downgrading of education/health care, flight of Christian minorities, professionals/ academics and general lawlessness. While during Saddam’s rule, according to the UN Iraq achieved prior to sanctions, the best free health and education in the region, together with a flourishing industrial manufacturing capability, eradication of illiteracy, public ownership of the oil resources, women’s equality, secular society where minorities rights are upheld and sincere solidarity with the Palestinian struggle.

His rule was ended by unilateral illegal foreign invasion.

His trial was a sham, illegal, unjust and violated all legal and human rights standards.

His brutal lynching was carried out by SAFAVID Iraqi with total contempt for normal human behaviour. Paradoxically his life was ended similarly to the fate of Imam Hussain and Omar Al Mukhtar by blind revenge. Indeed their despicable misconduct at the lynching has elevated Saddam to be regarded as a martyr by many in the Arab and Islamic world. Victors justice at its worst!



Riad El-Taher
Chair

Enter supporting content here